The attack change the blundering Bush administration from a vacationing President to as he called himself a "War President" with War in his mind. It also changed the American psyche forever. It made terrorism something that no longer happened in other places but could happen to them at anytime. That fear was then played up by the Bush administration to make sweeping changes to our government and country. The administration led the country into two wars. In October 2011 with support from various NATO nations we invaded Afghanistan with the purpose of finding Osama bin Laden, the leader of al-Qaeda. Later the administration started making the case to invade Iraq and according to Bush's Treasury Secretary, Paul O'Neill, the administration was intent in removing Saddam Hussein from power prior to the terrorist attack on 9/11. The administration claimed Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and wanted to use them on the United States. In an address to the nation on March 22, 2003 President Bush stated "our mission is clear, to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people." According to an article by Joby Warrick of the Washington Post WMDs or biological weapons where never found.
The administration also took this opportunity to create a new behemoth of an organization to rule all other intelligence agencies. The Department of Homeland security was born out of this chaos, not to mention the growth of what the Washington Post investigation called "Top Secret America"where over 850,000 people have top security clearances and large corporations are involved in this new business for profit. The patriot act was also created during this time and it gave those agencies broad scope in powers that allowed them to eaves drop on all American citizens.
The administration used the terrorist attack to push this country into a war on terrorism. The reaction and response to the terrorist attack was overkill. It created fear and suffering not only in this country but through out the world. The intent presented to the public was to make america safe from terrorism.
There are various people that believe the war with Iraq was worth it. James Phillips Senior Research Fellow for Middle Eastern Affairs at the Heritage Foundation stated that "...the Iraq war was a risk worth taking". Abraham Sofaer George P. Shultz Distinguished Scholar and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution stated "...the war was worth the cost, for one reason above all: It freed the world of a dangerous, determined, and irrational leader..." CBS News national security analyst Juan Zarate believes that we are much safer now in this new world than what we were in 2001. He believes we have better intelligence sharing and cooperation around the world. He states "the proof is in the pudding we've disrupted plots". The 9/11 Commission 10 year report card in conclusion states "Today, our country is undoubtedly safer and more secure
than it was a decade ago."
Lindsay,
ReplyDeleteGreat post! You've crafted a great argument, very strong, around some cold, hard facts that you aptly researched. Great work!
I like your introduction. The first three paragraphs set the state - the history - and give the reader a great sense of the event and its direct aftermath. That's great knowledge.
Then, you clearly state your thesis statement in the fourth paragraph - with "overkill".
This is good. Your reader needs to know what you are trying to prove in your post.
You have a solid opposing viewpoint paragraph, followed by a stronger (personal) analysis. Great job of presenting facts and quotes for both sides of the argument. In doing so, you better educate your reader.
Here are some suggestions to improve for next time:
1. Be careful of typos around capitalizing proper nouns, such as World Trade Center, America, and Patriot Act.
2. Try to state your thesis in your opening paragraph. Go for it right away, so that your reader knows what they are getting into - right off the bat. You can include the history and background in there too, but let your reader know the objective is to proof your thesis to them.
3. You do a great job of listing off facts in the final paragraph, but insert more sentences, of your own words and explanation, about how those facts tie into your thesis. Explain why these facts are relative and pertinent. I like how you have lots of facts, but explaining why these facts matter (and prove your point) is very important.
Overall, you've written a well-crafted, well-researched, and informative post. Great work! I'm glad to see you making adjustments and improvements each week.
Keep pushing it!
GR: 95